Request for Special Master Granted by Judge Appointed by Trump

News -- September 5, 2022: The Justice Department's use of the materials for investigational reasons was temporarily delayed by a federal court on Monday, who also granted the former president's legal team's

request to appoint a special master to analyze documents taken by the FBI from his Florida home last month.

The U.S. decision The Justice Department argued that an outside legal expert was not required, in part because staff members had already finished their assessment of possibly privileged records, but District Judge Aileen Cannon overruled them. Earlier this month, during arguments, the judge had hinted that she could be inclined to support the appointment of a special master by asking the department's attorney, "What is the harm?"

Given that the judge has ordered the Justice Department not to use any of the confiscated files for investigative reasons at this time, the appointment is likely to delay down the department's probe into the presence of top-secret information at Mar-a-Lago. However, it is unclear whether it will significantly influence any investigative choices or the investigation's final result.

Trump nominated Cannon to the bench in 2020.

Trump's attorneys had contended that a special master—typically an outside attorney or former judge—was required to ensure an impartial assessment of the documents seized during the search on August 8. They have said that such a review was required in order to filter out any personal information or papers that the FBI had found, return them to Trump, and separate any documents covered by executive privilege or the attorney-client privilege from the remainder of the inquiry.

The Justice Department argued against the appointment, claiming it was superfluous given that it had already evaluated papers that might be private and had narrowed down the number of items that might be protected by attorney-client privilege.

Additionally, it stated that because Trump is no longer the president and the records do not belong to him, he is not entitled to receive any of the presidential records that were taken back. Additionally, the department has claimed that discovered personal items contained sensitive information, making them potentially useful as evidence.

WNCTIMES by Marjorie Farrington

Donation Campaigns

Wnctimes LLC Donations

Wnctimes LLC has been providing a valuable community service for 22 years, and we have no plans of stopping—but that doesn't ..

Newsletter Subscriptions

WNCTIMES on Facebook


RT @GoodNewsCorres1: 71-yr-old man called Pa’at reaches Pacific Crest Trail Northern Terminus after having walked every step of 2,653 mile…
About 15 hours ago
RT @GreatSmokyNPS: Repost from @Discovrlife Our SmokiesMostWanted species spotlight this week is white turtlehead, Chelone glabra. Named…
About 15 hours ago
Pedestrian Dies, APD Reminder October i Pedestrian Safety Month PedestrianSafetyMonth…
About 15 hours ago
RT @wncnaturecenter: Voting for our October photo contest is now OPEN! Head on over to Facebook to cast your vote for your favorites! The w…
About 15 hours ago
Idaho University Employees Risk Felony for Plan B or Abortion Referral PlanB abortion…
About 21 hours ago